OpenAI requested the US government to ban DeepSeek, a Chinese AI lab, citing state control and potential user data compromise. The video argues this is a competitive move by OpenAI, as DeepSeek's open-source approach and research surpass OpenAI's, despite comparable model capabilities. The author criticizes OpenAI's hypocrisy regarding "openness," highlighting DeepSeek's significant contributions to the field. The ban is deemed excessive and counterproductive to AI advancement. OpenAI's pricing and commitment to open source are questioned, contrasting with their request to ban DeepSeek. DeepSeek's models are faster and cheaper to build due to sponsorships and cutting-edge technology, resulting in significant time savings (e.g., Docker builds reduced from 9 minutes to 1 minute 27 seconds). OpenAI's "open" claim is debated, highlighting limitations on using their models outside their infrastructure. DeepSeek's open-sourcing of innovations (e.g., faster training, context compression) and its collaboration with Welch Labs are showcased. Concerns arise regarding DeepSeek's state-subsidized nature, its compliance with Chinese law, and potential user data implications, leading to OpenAI's proposal to ban it. The author expresses disappointment with OpenAI's ban proposal, viewing it as counterproductive and harmful to innovation. The author highlights DeepSeek's impressive capabilities (e.g., DeepSeek r1's model) and advocates for a more open and collaborative approach. OpenAI's actions are compared to Apple's restrictive practices. The author encourages viewers to explore DeepSeek models despite the controversy.